There was More than One Shooter at Pulse in Orlando

 

13orlando-photo3-master675

 

Real life is not like the movies. People are surprisingly hard to kill. Bullets, even from an AR-15 “semi-automatic rifle” do not leave one person to kill others.

Currently the media has created a narrative. Omar Mateen acted alone when he shot up the Pulse nightclub in Orlando. This “lone wolf” killed over 50 people and maimed 53. That’s a casualty count of over 100.

 

orlando-shooting

 

Even at closed quarters, it takes several rounds to kill a person. People are terrible shots. People who are full of adrenaline and have been running are also terrible shots. Witness interviews also indicate that Mateen shot into the ceiling.

How many rounds of ammo did Mateen have, and would that number be enough to take out over 100 people?

To prove this to be true, here is what we would need:

  1. Firearms used (currently rumored to be an AR-15, plus a “handgun”)
  2. Each magazine used
  3. Casualty count (total dead and wounded)
  4. Ballistic report from each victim (how many rounds are in each victim)
  5. Pictures of entire structure with bullet holes counted

The firearms used and expended magazines would tell us how many bullets were fired into Pulse and the victims. We would also need to match the ballistic reports to the firearm used to ensure that no other firearm (and thus shooter) was responsible for the deaths of the victims.

 

 

 

Why isn’t the media even asking for this basic evidence?

We’d need a count of all bullets found in Pulse to apply some math. Why? Let’s reason this out.

Assuming the shooter had tactical training, he’d be carrying a load bearing vest with 8 fully loaded 30 round magazines, for a total of 9 magazines (one on his weapon). That’s 270 rounds.

Mateen would also have a fully-loaded pistol with an unknown number of magazines. Let’s assume he was using a 9mm handgun, which holds a 15 round magazine, and that he was carrying 4 additional magazines. That’s 75 rounds of 9mm ammo.

In total, Mateen would have had 345 rounds of ammunition.

If you think 345 rounds of ammo is a lot, talk to some soldiers. People are hard to kill.

Also watch this video. You can hear 30 rounds go off in a matter of seconds. Yet somehow the shooter was killing people for 3 hours?

 

 

Talk to any soldier. Even at close ranges, that is not much ammo. According to the official story, Mateen averaged 3.45 rounds per casualty. That short of sheer killing power would make him the envy of even trained special operations soldiers.

If Mateen had over 345 rounds of ammo, where was he holding it?

Some other questions and objections to consider.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Multiple witness reported seeing multiple shooters.

Eye witness accounts are of course suspect, and we must be aware of hoaxes. Yet the media isn’t even asking questions or doing research.

 

 

 

 

 

“I heard gunfire coming from two directions.” – Eyewitness

One eye witness told a reporter:

“When I dropped to the floor and saw people crying and covered in blood. The scent of the ammunition and bullets, I was like ‘This is real life. This is happening right now.’”

He said he never saw the gunman, who was in an adjacent room about 20 feet away. He said he thought the initial burst of gunfire lasted eight or nine minutes.

“He kept on shooting and shooting and shooting, rapid fire,’’ Gonzalez said, “and he’d change (clips), put in more ammunition — bud-dudda. I could smell the ammo in the air.’’

He said he heard another gun from a different direction, so he wonders if there were two gunmen.

Why would the government and media lie?

 

 

 

 

 

There is more to the story than the media is reporting.

 

 

Remember that “journalists” hate guns.

Simply read my analysis, above.

Why isn’t the media asking about the tactical gear Omar S. Mateen was using?

They don’t even know what questions to ask, and all anyone is doing is repeating what the government has told them.

As you follow the story, look for this evidence. If we don’t see all of this, then there was a second shooter.

  1. Firearms used 
  2. Each magazine used
  3. Casualty count
  4. Ballistic report from each victim
  5. Pictures of entire structure with bullet holes counted

Again, why isn’t the media even asking to see this evidence? Why is every story merely repeating the official story?

Think for yourselves.

 

 

Source